Commentary, The Long Retreat No. 54

Looking back through my notes, I see that Jakob was originally called Isaak. If I could go back, I think I’d probably edit him out, and in fact, that’s probably what I’ll do when I edit this one for publication. It isn’t just that he doesn’t add anything, it’s that he’s pretty much superfluous.

He would still show up, which is the benefit of having a future-seeing character. The downside is that you have to be very careful about explaining why he can’t see the future all the time.

This entry was posted in Commentary, The Long Retreat Commentary. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply